Canadian in jail American not
Guest
|
Post by Canadian in jail American not on Jan 13, 2007 23:49:48 GMT -5
Double standard in application of international warrants! Canadian - two weeks in jail, American out on www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2007/01/03/qc-myriambedard20070103.htmlA judge has ruled that former Canadian Olympian Myriam Bédard will stay in a U.S. jail until at least Thursday, prompting her lawyer to allege it's "retaliation" for whistleblowing in the sponsorship scandal. The 1994 biathlon champion, who has been detained in Maryland since Dec. 22, had sought release on bail so that she could return to the city of Quebec on her own in order to face charges of parental child abduction. She's accused of breaking a custody agreement with her ex-husband by removing their 12-year-old daughter, Maude, from the city and country. But a judge in Baltimore ruled Wednesday afternoon that Bédard would remain in police custody until she is handed over to Canadian authorities, who had 36 hours as of the ruling to pick her up. Kevin McCants, Bédard's American lawyer, said Bédard and her second husband, Nima Mazhari, believe Canadian authorities have left Bédard to languish in jail as a way to punish her for the role she played in the federal sponsorship scandal. Bédard told a parliamentary committee two years earlier that she was fired from Via Rail's marketing department because she raised concerns about contracts with Groupaction. The Montreal-based advertising agency was one of the Liberal-connected companies in Quebec that received hundreds of thousands of dollars under the federal sponsorship program for doing little or no work. "She's sitting in jail, and there's no reason that the paperwork for her release has been sitting there since the 29th [of December]," McCants told reporters outside the Baltimore courthouse Wednesday afternoon
|
|
|
Post by bizzi on Jan 14, 2007 7:12:18 GMT -5
Their Americans what did you think was going to happen?
Our Governments are buddies.
She screwed The Government here and now she is paying for it. And so are her children. So let that be a lession as to what happens when you blow the whistle on them for being theifs. Just like they throw us in jail for speaking out against our Government and C.A.S and deny us bail and band us off the internet for a year trying to stop this domain and others. It's pathetic.
We need a new system of Government. Desperately!!!!
|
|
|
Post by bizzi on Jan 14, 2007 7:13:31 GMT -5
This one has killed to many of it's own people in the name doing whats "right".
And the "haves" are the only ones who will say otherwise. And that their is nuthing wrong with this system. Dead kids are okay they said.
|
|
|
Post by bizzi on Jan 14, 2007 7:16:16 GMT -5
Just like they told me their is nothing wrong with TD's child being abused.
|
|
|
Post by bizzi on Jan 14, 2007 7:17:54 GMT -5
I talked to the child advocate office..... he said oh well. WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING..
And C.A.S wants to make them advocates instead of the Ombudsman? I guess we know why now.
|
|
|
Post by Dean Robinson on Jan 14, 2007 12:37:38 GMT -5
Morning Bizzi. sounds like it was another exciting nite in or nations capital. lol 07 is officially started Biz lets change the name to C.A.S 3.07 hehehe. anyway the the child advocate office is a fabricated agency thats main purpose was to take the heat off the Dalton gang for bring such f**kups.
They (The Libs) knew that some shady things were happening in the CAS and that the Auditors report was going to catch it! So in September they put this little group together. think about it. It just happens to be announced, yes just days before the report came out, Funny thing is, it may have worked if Mary Ann Chambers had any acting ability's at all. But she failed the test. Remember the only reason Chambers hold the position is because she is a female minority. she was place in this position to create votes from the poor black folk in her riding. she is an aunt Tom folks thats it. I have many Black friend in the T.O riding that will not vote for her in the next election. speaking of the next election in my area we have Caroline Dicocco another Liberal cabinet member . her claim to fame was the accountability bill. well she decided that being the a cabinet minister was more important then a government being held accountable so by accepting the position it meant that the bill would be scraped. She later when on to say that another party was putting up a bill similar to hers. But heres what pisses me off, Last week it was up for a vote on the same day an hour before the vote for there 25% pay raise. you get where I'm going with this don't you. The moron didn't even vote. but did manage to cast her vote in favor of of a pay raise.
Guys remember the name Caroline DiCocco. another shame on the liberal party. not a word of a lie her office here in Sarnia was approaced on a matter concernig the child Tax Benifit claw back. and a rep from her office tried to compare it to potholes in our city streets.
Just yesterday there was an artical in the local paper where she is quoted saying that Sarnias mayor needs to understand that we arent getting as much fund as a smaller Town (Chatham) because we dont have as many people on welfare. No shit she really said this!
|
|
|
Post by CEthier on Jan 14, 2007 13:18:20 GMT -5
The Child's Advocate Office are just a bunch of useless puppets.
I called the child's Advocate office and asked for help to expiunge my record with the CAS. I explained that my son has to live outside of the country because York CAS has fabricated false record and this as a result broke up my family.
They opened a file and called the CAS. The CAS lawyer told them that I never had a case with the CAS and the CAS never applied for 3 months CAS ward for my sone on the base of his dissability. Then the Child's advocate office refused to deal with me essentially calling me a lier. I have this in writing as I ask all the communication to be via email. Further I escalated to the Chief's Advocate - Judy Finley and the Child's Advicate office immediately closed my file indicating to contact them when my son is back in the country.
In other words this means : get yous son back to Canada so he can be put in the "Child's prison"( foster care) to be trained as a future criminal by the Canadian Government and in an environment of juvinail offenders , so if he makes it out there alife , then we will possibly handle the problem in few years when unrepairable damages are done to your child. WE DO NOT CARE! ( Judy Finlay! implied)
A year later Paul Conlin with Director's Review c. 68 CFSA recommended the expunging of the record. It is my perseption that this has not been done to date because I called the Ontario Human Rights Comission and was told that they received a copy of my CAS file.
|
|
|
Post by mary on Jan 23, 2007 22:29:24 GMT -5
January 23, 2007 12:00 PM CDT Court clears way for couple to reclaim child after 8 years NASHVILLE, TN -- The Tennessee Supreme Court has cleared the way for a Chinese couple to reclaim the daughter they placed in foster care nearly eight years ago. Jack and Casey He's little girl, Anna Mae, was placed in foster care when she was only three weeks old. Since then, the child has been living with Jerry and Louise Baker. The Hes are absolutely estatic about this decision by the State Surpreme Court, but Jerry and Louise Baker are so rattled, they can hardly talk. They say they're trying to figure out what this means for the future of the little girl they've raised for almost 8 years. A Memphis judge previously took away the parental rights of Anna Mae's birth parents, but Tuesday's Surpreme Court ruling means the Hes could soon get back their daughter. "I Love my kids. I love my daughter. She's a part of me......she's a part of me...," says Casey He. "It means that Anna Mae can come back to know she has a mom. She has a brother. She has a sister. In the future she can wake up in the morning seeing all the faces surrounding her, the same faces...," says Jack He. The court also directed the Shelby County Juvenile Court to "resolve the pending custody matter with a view toward reunification" of the child with her biological parents. The Hes have argued in court for years that they sent Anna Mae to live with the Bakers temporarily so she could have access to health insurance. When the Hes tried to get their daughter back, the Bakers refused to give her up. The Hes have not seen their daughter since 2 www.wreg.com/Global/story.asp?S=5977291If someone has Allison's email or send this to John Dunn please thanks
|
|
|
Post by CEthier on Jan 24, 2007 7:28:54 GMT -5
I am sure that if you find Bed and Breakfast in Kingston ... uh what was the hotel she did stay in ... look it up in the media ... as well the wife this cop that took her in - then they can put you in touch
|
|
|
Post by Anon on Mar 20, 2011 11:13:37 GMT -5
|
|