|
Post by td on Jul 10, 2007 22:56:33 GMT -5
thank-you, miax!
|
|
|
Post by fixchildrensaid on Jul 11, 2007 13:32:59 GMT -5
went to court yesterday and justice LECLAIR did give me a remand till august 13.2007!thank god its not a friday! ;D What exactly are you trying to serve on him? Did you sue him (or the police in general) for something he did? Please answer in specific sentences. It is sometimes hard to decipher what you are saying.
|
|
|
Post by Whistleblower on Jul 11, 2007 16:44:47 GMT -5
I think it is for his ex-parte Hearing that he has going on, I think TD can confirm that which is pretty much evidence gathering or facts finding hearing. I think he is trying to prove that the cop lied on reports, statements and he is trying to serve him to put him on the witness stand.
Right?
|
|
|
Post by td on Jul 11, 2007 17:19:07 GMT -5
well you have "a" right,but, you need b,c,d, other wise the judge will say" what does this cops false report have to do with/have bearing on the accused, and the crimes that you have alleged?, for if it had no bearing i would be in deep shit!but it does! the best way to explain it is go to my site and look at "why i really lost my job"
|
|
|
Post by fixchildrensaid on Jul 11, 2007 19:32:16 GMT -5
well you have "a" right,but, you need b,c,d, other wise the judge will say" what does this cops false report have to do with/have bearing on the accused, and the crimes that you have alleged?, for if it had no bearing i would be in deep shit!but it does! the best way to explain it is go to my site and look at "why i really lost my job" Where? What site? You didn't answer my question above. Do you want help in actually getting the cop served?
|
|
|
Post by Lorna on Jul 11, 2007 20:18:21 GMT -5
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but I have served papers (family court) to someone who wasn't mentioned on the papers, as long as you get the name of the person you gave the papers to and the address you served them at that should be enough....hand them to the desk guy, when he takes them tell him your served, and get his name, if he doest give it to you, when you go back to the court to swear you served him you tell the clerk you served the officer at the front desk and he wouldn't give you his/her name. It would be better to serve those papers at his/her work place......
I did this for family court though, but all you would have to do is call the clerk who will fill the papers in when you swear to the serve and ask.....
We are under the impression we have to serve the actual person, this is not true for family court.
|
|
|
Post by td on Jul 11, 2007 20:34:12 GMT -5
to ,Lorna: actually, the rules of service in family court are the same as in criminal, to which the expartay is, "criminal proceeding", but criminal it is supposed to be served by a peace #######,or a recognized person!, in conquerance with section 701 of the criminal code of canada, but there is a way around it!
|
|
|
Post by fixchildrensaid on Jul 12, 2007 16:42:07 GMT -5
well you have "a" right,but, you need b,c,d, other wise the judge will say" what does this cops false report have to do with/have bearing on the accused, and the crimes that you have alleged?, for if it had no bearing i would be in deep shit!but it does! the best way to explain it is go to my site and look at "why i really lost my job" Where? What site? You didn't answer my question above. Do you want help in actually getting the cop served? Still no answer? I, for one, am not going to waste any more time trying to help you in this matter. It certainly seems that you only want to complain about the cop, as opposed to actually getting anything accomplished.
|
|
|
Post by guest on Jul 13, 2007 12:44:19 GMT -5
Where? What site? You didn't answer my question above. Do you want help in actually getting the cop served? Still no answer? I, for one, am not going to waste any more time trying to help you in this matter we suggest Psychologists better still Royal College of Psychiatrists. It certainly seems that you only want to complain about the cop, as opposed to actually getting anything accomplished.
|
|
|
Post by td on Jul 13, 2007 13:11:57 GMT -5
now if every one would read this post, accurately, is this not the very same type of manipulation of statements that we see from c.a.s. workers?
|
|
|
Post by bizzi on Jul 13, 2007 13:14:34 GMT -5
Nobody can help TD. He is so lost and not in touch with reality that many of us gave up a long time ago. Pretty much to the point we just ignore his posts unless their super brain dead offensive. that need to be edited.
Countless attempts at conversations have just been 100X more frustration then could ever be worth.
Because TD DOES NOT LISTEN... at all...
|
|
|
Post by bizzi on Jul 13, 2007 13:18:14 GMT -5
I do give credit to those who still try... Thou i seen it end the same way every-time.
Some Phyc help is very much suggested.
|
|
|
Post by guest on Jul 13, 2007 13:57:23 GMT -5
When web sites encourage a person like TD, all lose credibility like the saying goes one bad apple in the basket will spoil the basket.
|
|
|
Post by guest on Jul 13, 2007 15:19:29 GMT -5
now if every one would read this post, accurately, is this not the very same type of manipulation of statements that we see from c.a.s. workers? You are the "living proof" sometimes "staged supervision" is justified.
|
|
|
Post by guest on Jul 13, 2007 16:47:06 GMT -5
Nobody can help TD. He is so lost and not in touch with reality that many of us gave up a long time ago. Pretty much to the point we just ignore his posts unless their super brain dead offensive. that need to be edited. Countless attempts at conversations have just been 100X more frustration then could ever be worth. Because TD DOES NOT LISTEN... at all... Ignore his (TD) posts facts: Since April 24/07 seven posts and 608 views 608 and 69 relies 69 and replies average 8.81 a post. The royal college is looking for patients.
|
|