|
Post by td on Jul 18, 2007 18:16:22 GMT -5
corect me if im wrong, or tell me how this is done but *the charter of rights is the foremost governing law of our land *to which the criminal code (the second foremost governing law of the land) is not only to insure us of our charter of rights but also superceeds any and all other laws under it including federall laws and provicial statues /acts Q1. so how is it that a mere provincial statue/act (that is a statute and not even law)is to superceed the crimnal code? what takes presidence? a provincial statue/act or the criminal code? Q2. and what does one do if violations of the criminal code,and the charter of rights are taking place during the inactment of a provincial statute? Q3. and is it not in the publics best interest to know if public (hruum) officers are repeatedly violating poeples charter of rights as well as repeatedly violating the criminal code? Q4. And would it not be professional misconduct and a criminal act for a (hruum) public officer to take part in allowing or assisting these violations to continue Q5. And with the identification of these violations, would it not force the inacted/legal proceedings of a provicial statute to be set aside or dismissed? Q6. and the identified perpotrators of these violations held accountable in accordance of the criminal code of canada? Q7. how can a c.a.s. worker claim that the c.f.s.a. superceeds the criminal code of canada? and justifies them violating of poeples charter of rights?
|
|