|
Post by td on Jul 3, 2007 20:56:01 GMT -5
I have a question that my very well be to far up there for anybodyhere!but! In the past expartay hearing, i had that crown removed, but she made two statements!, that go to directly, to display to the court, that she was not present in the court room,to question evidence and witnesses for the suposed purpose of making a descission and informing the court of the crowns intents to interveen in the prosecution or not!her statements go to demonstrate that she was there to deliberatly obstruct the expartay hearing with the intent of insuring that my complaint did not go any further for as stated to the judge, that the evidence that will come out in both the ex-partay hearing and the prosection would irrifutably identify crimes commited my multiple members off the crowns office, AND that they were carried out in collusion with multiple parties/agencies! but sence that it was done at the previous hearing, can i still bring it up now to show cause for ouside crown? and is the judge allowed to threaten you with a wrongfull charge? to which proof to prove the charge wrong was sitting in front of the judge! then the judge claimed that he doesnt think he is allowed to order the prosess of service! sujestions?, direction?, i have to do some case but, but brain storms would be apreciated
|
|