well, went to court this morning, and chew chew!
1. the female lawyer parissi, was there to represent c.a.s., donna brooks one of the witnesses, and jennifer giroux, now why would this lawyer be here?
2. and as far as the crown is concerned, he told the court (judge ross) that he was taking no position and only there as a observer,**down the proceedings**, i informed the court that on the last hearing of june 9 that the crown stated to the court that it intends to interceed, then with my phone conversation with that crown (gary roy) he confermened that they were going to opose charges and though indirect gary roy led me to beleive that if the judge ordered "process of service" that they
"the crown" would stay the charge, so i was wondering why the change of
their position,
well the crown today is freaking, and trying to intimidate me, by saying
to the court that if i was a lawyer he would be reporting me to the bar!
** Now corect me if im wrong here but but a, both previous crowns stated to the court that it intends to interceed, and in the phone conversation with crown gary roy, he stated that the senior crown makes that discission and hands down the task to the lower crowns, so my question is, again why the change of position?,
after debate, the judge orders that due to the fact that there is a ongoing matter in family court to which the affidavit pertains to that we could not proceed, and ajourned it till november 5, after the family case conferance
of october 10,,
but with this then this lawyer parissi stands up and says that after the case conferance that there will be a case management then something else then a trial,so it will be well into 2008.talk about railraod!
and to top it off, this judge at the request of the crown says that he is not holding the witnesses to the supoenas!for a crown whos there as merely an observer he had lots to say!
can you say chew chew?
and by the way guess who once again did not show,const boyd!
Bottom line they know the crimes that will come forth, obstruction, child neglect, child endangerement, entrapment, wrongull and malicious prosection, mutilation and torture of a child,lawyer tampering, conspiracy to murder, attempted murder and thats just one witness, guess which one
the best part is were it comes out in court that the crown itself ar part of the crimes that will come forth and thats why their there,
i wonder if thats why they are trying to obsolve the crowns office of obstruction by claiming they are taking no position, and called in other lawyers to obstruct,
IF THE CROWN REMAINED INTERCEEDING AND THE EVIDENCE TO THIS FACT COMES OUT WELL THEIRS LIABILITIES TO BE LEVIED, AND THAT THE JUDGE WOULD HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO ORDER A ADJOURNMENT
AND FOR THE ATTOURNEY GENERAL TO INVESTIGATE,THUS NO MORE IN THEIR HOUSE WITH THE CURTAINS DRAWN!SO THEIR FLIP FLOP MISLEADING AND MANIPULATION IS A DIRECT DISPLAY THEIR CRIMINAL AND CORRUPTIVE INTENTS!
AND WITH THE CROWN SAYING IN COURT(PARAPHRASING) I DONT BELEIVE THAT THEIR WILL EVEN BE CHARGES EVEN LAID, WELL IM SURE
YOU`SE CAN FIGURE IT OUT FROM THERE!