|
Post by td on Aug 28, 2007 19:04:55 GMT -5
i need to know if the judges rulling at the ex partay hearing "that i could not proceed with the ex partay hearing/prosecution do to the fact that the falsely fabricated affidavit of Jeniffer giroux to which are the basis of the ex-partay hearing is still before another court", and where do i find it in black letter law? either which way if it is the truth or not, it still exposes their criminal intents but need black letter law to prove this before the courts.
even though i do beleived it will be right back at me, it will go to motive of things to come
|
|
|
Post by happypuppy on Aug 28, 2007 22:25:47 GMT -5
I know a person that had a protection matter before Family Court, but was also charged in criminal court and it was related to the CAS. The criminal court proceeded even though the other, is still before the family court.
|
|
|
Post by td on Aug 28, 2007 23:49:34 GMT -5
THANKS FOR REPLYING BUT I WOULD NEED TO HEAR FROM THAT PERSON FOR THERE ARE TOMANY VARIABLES SUCH AS HORSE BEFORE THE CART AND/OR CART BEFORE THE HORSE, BUT IT WOULD APPLY TO A CERTAIN EXTENT, ARE YOU ABLE TO GIVE ME THE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDERS AND FACTS TO CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE?
|
|
|
Post by bizzi on Aug 29, 2007 9:42:52 GMT -5
T.D ....... *caps*
|
|
|
Post by td on Aug 29, 2007 14:10:34 GMT -5
hmmmm, my eyes were tired
|
|