|
Post by Dean Robinson on May 1, 2007 9:21:06 GMT -5
Ive seen this Ip alot lately so I did a check on it. lol well it be longs to, get this Dalton Our beloved Premire. party look up this domian .ontla.ola.org i guess with the help of Bizzi and a few of the others like reality we are becoming quite popular lol www.ontla.on.ca/web/home.doI hope some of the topics sink in and they just dont use the info for some more BS promises Search results for: 192.75.172.1 OrgName: Legislative Information Systems OrgID: LIS Address: 99 Wellesley Street West Address: Room 2330 City: Toronto StateProv: ON PostalCode: M7A-1A2 Country: CA NetRange: 192.75.172.0 - 192.75.172.255 CIDR: 192.75.172.0/24 NetName: OLA-LIS1-GOV NetHandle: NET-192-75-172-0-1 Parent: NET-192-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Assignment NameServer: GATEWAY.ONTLA.ON.CA NameServer: NS1.BUSINESS.ALLSTREAM.NET Comment: RegDate: 1990-03-26 Updated: 2005-08-12 RTechHandle: SM1936-ARIN RTechName: MacDougall, Steve RTechPhone: +1-416-325-3662 RTechEmail: steve_macdougall@ontla.ola.org OrgTechHandle: SM1936-ARIN OrgTechName: MacDougall, Steve OrgTechPhone: +1-416-325-3662 OrgTechEmail: steve_macdougall@ontla.ola.org
|
|
|
Post by prepared on May 1, 2007 9:55:14 GMT -5
Ive seen this Ip alot lately so I did a check on it. lol well it be longs to, get this Dalton Our beloved Premire. party look up this domian .ontla.ola.org i guess with the help of Bizzi and a few of the others like reality we are becoming quite popular lol www.ontla.on.ca/web/home.doI hope some of the topics sink in and they just dont use the info for some more BS promises Search results for: 192.75.172.1 OrgName: Legislative Information Systems OrgID: LIS Address: 99 Wellesley Street West Address: Room 2330 City: Toronto StateProv: ON PostalCode: M7A-1A2 Country: CA NetRange: 192.75.172.0 - 192.75.172.255 CIDR: 192.75.172.0/24 NetName: OLA-LIS1-GOV NetHandle: NET-192-75-172-0-1 Parent: NET-192-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Assignment NameServer: GATEWAY.ONTLA.ON.CA NameServer: NS1.BUSINESS.ALLSTREAM.NET Comment: RegDate: 1990-03-26 Updated: 2005-08-12 RTechHandle: SM1936-ARIN RTechName: MacDougall, Steve RTechPhone: +1-416-325-3662 RTechEmail: steve_macdougall@ontla.ola.org OrgTechHandle: SM1936-ARIN OrgTechName: MacDougall, Steve OrgTechPhone: +1-416-325-3662 OrgTechEmail: steve_macdougall@ontla.ola.org Couple of comments. - How do you know that the IP address actually belongs to Dalton McGuinty, and not Caroline DiCocco -- Or even the Queen's Park janitor?
- Looks like the IT people at Queen's Park named their DNS server 'gateway' too. That's what I named my DNS server. I'm sure they were first though. No delusions of grandeur here. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Dean Robinson on May 1, 2007 10:53:17 GMT -5
Dalton McGuinty, and not Caroline DiCocco -- Or even the Queen's Park janitor? lol Who ever it is Im pretty sure we dont pay them to surf the net.
|
|
|
Post by prepared on May 1, 2007 12:50:50 GMT -5
Dalton McGuinty, and not Caroline DiCocco -- Or even the Queen's Park janitor? lol Who ever it is Im pretty sure we dont pay them to surf the net. Well, if it's Caroline DiCocco, I suppose you could argue that she's touching base with her constituents. If it's the Queen's Park janitor, I suppose it's possible that he or she has an issue with the Children's Aid Society. I highly doubt that the premier would be surfing this site. He's far too busy with other things, and Sarnia-Lambton isn't his riding. There are other possibilities that shouldn't be overlooked either. Does Queen's Park offer a wireless access point for those in and around the Legislative building? My guess would be that they probably do. There's also the possibility that someone has merely spoofed the IP address. Spoofing IP addresses is not a difficult thing to do, believe it or not. There's two other possibilities that I can think of off the top of my head, but I'm not going to put much stock in them. One such possibility is that you are in error in thinking that an IP address from Queen's Park has been visiting your site. The final possibility is that you're pulling a May Fool's joke on your members. lol EDIT: Speaking of janitors, did anyone see the piece in the Observer about the Sarnia Police Service's budget? David Boushy has suggested that some of the items in the budget seem a tad bit on the high side. I have to say that I agree with him.
The budget for janitorial services was on the order of $220,000 per year. This was for two full-time janitors and one part-time janitor. Just making an uneducated guess at how much these three janitors earn, is it possible that the two full-time janitors are earning $80,000 per year, while the part-time janitor is pulling in a measly $60,000? If so, I think the janitors at the Sarnia Police Service are underpaid.
Of course, the article doesn't mention what this $220,000 covers. It simply states that they spend $220,000 per year for the salaries and benefits of two full-time and one-part time janitors. It's possible that janitorial supplies and equipment are budgeted in this amount as well.
|
|
|
Post by bizzi on May 1, 2007 14:35:10 GMT -5
The Government has most of our sites blocked.
Only the privileged have access I am afraid so that eliminates the janitor....lol
|
|
|
Post by prepared on May 1, 2007 14:39:56 GMT -5
The Government has most of our sites blocked. Only the privileged have access I am afraid so that eliminates the janitor....lol Not necessarily. The janitor could be using the computer of one of the privileged. I hear that people in Government aren't security conscious and leave things like passwords attached to their monitors with 3M Post-It notes. lol
|
|
|
Post by bizzi on May 1, 2007 16:05:00 GMT -5
And worse...
|
|
|
Post by Lorna on May 1, 2007 17:59:39 GMT -5
Who cares who it was, it was someone up there in that building and they know we are here and we are NOT going away.......I sent Dalton old boy an email the other day......he must be to busy to even pass the buck on to someone else.....Well Dalton if you or your crew are reading this post you can forget about a vote from me, your not getting it...or my family, they have been watching you too, and your idiots, i mean members, and your NOT doing your job the way your should be, unless you think we want to keep giving you a FUCKING raise you dont deserve......Keep up the reading though, we love having new members in here, they dont steal or waist our tax dollars, and in my opinion that's what the government is doing. What is that that American Donald Trump says.........Oh ya.....YOUR FIRED....
|
|
|
Post by You know who on May 1, 2007 19:00:34 GMT -5
I'm sure you all will fry me for saying this but, isn't getting the gov't attention the entire point if this site. I think you missed the entire point.........Someone there is at least looking!!!!!! Good or bad they are doing something. Why are you assuming it was bad? You post there Ip why? Isn't Knowing their looking good enough. If I was Dean I'd pat myself on the back because they are looking. Which is a start. Frying them or calling them names isn't helping your cause and will get you nowhere with them. Welcoming them and starting a dialog good or bad is what you need to be doing. This site may of just missed a very good opportunity for change. They don't come around everyday.
|
|
|
Post by REALITY on May 1, 2007 19:47:16 GMT -5
I'm sure you all will fry me for saying this but, isn't getting the gov't attention the entire point if this site. I think you missed the entire point.........Someone there is at least looking!!!!!! Good or bad they are doing something. Why are you assuming it was bad? You post there Ip why? Isn't Knowing their looking good enough. If I was Dean I'd pat myself on the back because they are looking. Which is a start. Frying them or calling them names isn't helping your cause and will get you nowhere with them. Welcoming them and starting a dialog good or bad is what you need to be doing. This site may of just missed a very good opportunity for change. They don't come around everyday. I don't know who, but this is definitely worth reading again.
|
|
|
Post by Dean Robinson on May 1, 2007 21:20:27 GMT -5
I agree lets open the board to the liberalsand the of the parties, and start a civil talk with them. they know what is needed and so do we. lets welcome any MPP and ask if they are willing to help lets get them to agree that bill 88 needs to be passed, let me be the first to say sorry my anger will not solve our problems but my faith in my elected Mpp will.
|
|
|
Post by miyaxanagel on May 4, 2007 9:15:19 GMT -5
LOL That has to be amusing. I often wondered if Ms. Chambers had visited this site? mmmm? Did you get her?
I agree we have to be careful who we vote in the next Elections. Whether they are CAS support or neutral and wants a change in our Country. Be careful when you vote for who MPP would be and who PM will be. Even down to the Judges. Root them out. They are CAS "rear end" kissers.
Never mind, just watch out for any one that supports CAS and make a change in this Country. You're the one that pays the tax dollar and you are the one that agrees to CAS because you voted that person into office!
|
|